 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
This case study is to assist project proponents to gain an insight into the accreditation process. IPART has prepared a case study of an accredited large user project using the Greenhouse Gas Benchmark Rule (Large User Abatement Certificates) No.4 of 2003:
|
|
|
|
